Colleagues from the MEDIS:ON project, led by SΛTIS member Tomáš Lintner, have published a new article in Education and Information Technologies titled Generative AI use and academic achievement: a cross-sectional study of Czech seventh-grade students. The study is co-authored by SΛTIS member Markéta Žáková.
Drawing on the deep versus surface approaches to learning framework, the study distinguishes between two separate aspects of student engagement with GenAI: how frequently students use these tools, and the extent to which they endorse reliance on GenAI over understanding — defined as the belief that knowing how to prompt AI effectively matters more than developing one's own conceptual grasp of the material.
Using cross-sectional survey data from a nationally stratified sample of 2,307 seventh-grade students, the authors estimated structural equation models predicting IRT-scaled achievement in mathematics and Czech language. The frequency of GenAI use was not positively associated with achievement in either subject. In contrast, a stronger tendency to rely on GenAI instead of building understanding was consistently and negatively associated with achievement, with a more pronounced effect in Czech language. Neither frequency of use nor reliance significantly moderated the associations between learning-related dispositions and achievement.
The findings suggest that the educational implications of GenAI depend less on how often students use AI tools and more on whether AI is approached as a support for understanding or as a substitute for cognitive engagement. The results contribute to ongoing debates on epistemic offloading and the role of AI in shaping students' orientations toward learning.
Read the full article here.